renova procolor PO (Propositional Object units) and S (syllables units) represent the different types of node in DORA. P(DP) represents the top-level unit is a determiner phase and P(s) represents the highest-level unit is a sentence. (c). Simulation results on power, in which the red dotted line and blue solid line represent the frequency response of the sentences and the phrases, respectively. The shading area covers two s.e.m centered on the mean. (d). Statistical comparison on the frequency combined power using paired sample t-test suggested that the power for the sentences was significantly higher than the phrases (t (99) = 8.40, p < 3.25e-13, ***). (e). Results of power coupling between PO-units and S-units, where the red and blue squares show the frequency separated coupling level for the sentences and the phrases, respectively. (f). Statistical comparison on the level of power coupling using paired sample t-test suggested that the power coupling level for the sentences was significantly higher than the phrases (t (99) = 251.02, p < 1e-31, ***). (g). Results of phase coherence, in which the red-dotted line and blue-solid line shows the phase coherence of the sentences and the phrases, respectively. The shading area represents two s.e.m centered on the mean. (h). Statistical comparison of the phase coherence was conducted using paired sample t-test on the frequency averaged response. The comparison indicates that the phase coherence of the sentences was significantly higher than that of the phrases (t (99) = 10.24, p < 1e-20, ***). (i). Phase coupling between PO-units and S-units, the red and blue circles show the level of phase synchronization of the sentences and the phrases, respectively. (j). Statistical comparison on the level of phase coupling between the phrases and the sentences using paired sample t-test suggested that the phase coupling level for the sentences was significantly higher than the phrases (t (99) = 296.03, p < 1e-39, ***). The underlying data can be found in https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6595789. Credit: Fan Bai, Antje S. Meyer and Andrea E. Martin” width=”800″ height=”328″>
The brain links incoming speech sounds to knowledge of grammar, which is abstract in nature. But how does the brain encode abstract sentence structure? In a neuroimaging study published in PLOS Biology, researchers from the Max Planck Institute of Psycholinguistics and Radboud University in Nijmegen report that the brain encodes the structure of sentences (“the vase is red”) and phrases (“the red vase”) into different neural firing patterns.
How does the brain represent sentences? This is one of the fundamental questions in neuroscience, because sentences are an example of abstract structural knowledge that is not directly observable from speech. While all sentences are made up of smaller building blocks, such as words and phrases, not all combinations of words or phrases lead to sentences. In fact, listeners need more than just knowledge of which words occur together: they need abstract knowledge of language structure to understand a sentence. So how does the brain encode the structural relationships that make up a sentence?
Lise Meitner Group Leader Andrea Martin already had a theory on how the brain computes linguistic structure, based on evidence from computer simulations. To further test this “time-based” model of the structure of language, which was developed together with Leonidas Doumas from the University of Edinburgh, Martin and colleagues used EEG (electroencephalography) to measure neural responses through the scalp. In a collaboration with first author and Ph.D. candidate Fan Bai and MPI director Antje Meyer, she set out to investigate whether the brain responds differently to sentences and phrases, and if this could hint at how the brain encodes abstract structure.
The researchers created sets of spoken Dutch phrases (such as “de rode vaas,” “the red vase”) and sentences (such as “de vaas is rood,” “the vase is red”), which were identical in duration and number of syllables, and highly similar in meaning. They also created pictures with objects (such as a vase) in five different colors. Fifteen adult native speakers of Dutch participated in the experiment. For each spoken stimulus, they were asked to perform one of three tasks in random order. The first task was structure-related, as participants had to decide whether they had heard a phrase or a sentence by pushing a button. The second and third task were meaning-related, as participants had to decide whether the color or object of the spoken stimulus matched the picture that followed.
As expected from computational simulations, the activation patterns of neurons in the brain were different for phrases and sentences, in terms of both timing and strength of neural connections. “Our findings show how the brain separates speech into linguistic structure by using the timing and connectivity of neural firing patterns. These signals from the brain provide a novel basis for future research on how our brains create language,” says Martin.
Source: Read Full Article